Fri, May 18, 2012 - 4:44:AM

Welcome to Turner Padget

With five offices strategically located across South Carolina, Turner Padget has extensive experience representing clients throughout the state. Because our attorneys have a deep understanding of South Carolina’s laws and what it takes to do business in the Palmetto State, we provide our clients with straightforward, practical advice targeted at meeting their legal demands. In addition, we have experience in dealing with various out-of-state and international issues. Whether a client's needs are in South Carolina or beyond, our attorneys employ a sensible and well-reasoned approach in handling matters, and we pride ourselves in providing both effective and efficient representation to our clients.

Turner Padget
News & Events

Art Justice Recognized by United Way

Turner Padget Graham & Laney, P.A. is pleased to announce Arthur E. Justice, Jr. received the United Way of Florence County's 2012 Ashpy P. Lowrimore Annual Award during the organization's annual meeting held on April 3, 2012, at the SiMT Building in Florence.

Jonathan Kresken Joins Turner Padget

Myrtle Beach, S.C., (April 2, 2012) — Turner Padget Graham & Laney, P.A. is pleased to announce that Jonathan P. Kresken has joined the firm’s Myrtle Beach office.

South Carolina
News

The Sun News Business Section

Turner Padget Blog

Trayvon Martin’s Death Raises Concerns for Community Associations Nationwide

Attorney: Shawn R. Willis May 11 2012

The recent shooting of Trayvon Martin by George Zimmerman in Sanford, Fla. has attracted a flood of national attention due to the highly charged legal, political and cultural issues involved. One particular issue that has surfaced is whether the homeowners’ association for Zimmerman’s neighborhood has any civil liability in connection with the shooting. This is a novel question, and community associations everywhere should pay close attention to this case.

Brad Easterling and Sam Sammataro triumph

April 05 2012

The claimant alleged he sustained a compensable hernia injury while moving heavy equipment at the employer’s mill. The employer and carrier denied the claim on the basis that ample medical evidence established the hernia existed prior to the accident.